![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
My latest Julie offering is up on Bookfunnel for the next few days, until the release date on the 26th! Feel free to grab a copy.
A mansion, a cat, a mystery – and a murder to solve.
Download on Bookfunnel!
My latest Julie offering is up on Bookfunnel for the next few days, until the release date on the 26th! Feel free to grab a copy.
A mansion, a cat, a mystery – and a murder to solve.
Download on Bookfunnel!
Oh look it's a book
Nov. 25th, 2023 07:03 pmJulie's latest, and my first stab at a Christmas cozy! Full length novel, unlike the shorter campground mysteries.
Download on Bookfunnel. The link will stop working when the book goes live on Amazon on Dec. 1.
( Blurb under the cut )
Cover or blurb suggestions are welcome if you have any. I've still got a couple of days left for changes.
Download on Bookfunnel. The link will stop working when the book goes live on Amazon on Dec. 1.
( Blurb under the cut )
Cover or blurb suggestions are welcome if you have any. I've still got a couple of days left for changes.
I realize at least some of these are more adjacent to actual genre cozies. That being said, if you are bored and would like to fill out a poll, may I ask you to contemplate these book series concepts and then vote for any of the questions in the following poll that you have an opinion on.
Turnkey Bookshop
Elderly widow buys/inherits a big complicated old building full of boxes of books, old letters, secret doors, and at least one dead body. The emphasis here is mostly on exploring the building and opening a bookstore with a sideline in mystery solving.
Hired Mourner
Aspiring actress has a sideline as a hired mourner attending (mostly) rich people's funerals and often pretending to be a distant relative. In the first book, a funeral at which a body turns up dead, she realizes that *every single person there* is actually a hired mourner as well, all of them having been given different specific roles to play. But who is a killer?
Book Detective
Middle-aged divorcee opens a small bookshop with a specialty in finding very specific books for people, which turns out to involve solving their personal problems as well. And murders.
Spies in Paradise
Millennial-age underemployed college graduate works as a receptionist for her uncle's charter fishing business on the Florida coast (or somewhere like that), finds a guy on the beach who appears to have lost his memory, tries to figure out who he is with the help of her uncle's cadre of senior friends while bodies pile up. Sort of like Bourne Identity but with a Greek chorus of old people and way cozier violence.
Art Detectives
Young female artist turns art crimes solver with the help of an elderly art thief mentor gone straight.
I realize there are no new things under the sun, etc, but that next-to-last question is in there mostly to make sure that I'm not ripping off every detail from something else I only vaguely half remember, so that I can change it up a bit.
Turnkey Bookshop
Elderly widow buys/inherits a big complicated old building full of boxes of books, old letters, secret doors, and at least one dead body. The emphasis here is mostly on exploring the building and opening a bookstore with a sideline in mystery solving.
Hired Mourner
Aspiring actress has a sideline as a hired mourner attending (mostly) rich people's funerals and often pretending to be a distant relative. In the first book, a funeral at which a body turns up dead, she realizes that *every single person there* is actually a hired mourner as well, all of them having been given different specific roles to play. But who is a killer?
Book Detective
Middle-aged divorcee opens a small bookshop with a specialty in finding very specific books for people, which turns out to involve solving their personal problems as well. And murders.
Spies in Paradise
Millennial-age underemployed college graduate works as a receptionist for her uncle's charter fishing business on the Florida coast (or somewhere like that), finds a guy on the beach who appears to have lost his memory, tries to figure out who he is with the help of her uncle's cadre of senior friends while bodies pile up. Sort of like Bourne Identity but with a Greek chorus of old people and way cozier violence.
Art Detectives
Young female artist turns art crimes solver with the help of an elderly art thief mentor gone straight.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 75
Which of these sound like the most commercial and/or bestselling idea(s) to you?
View Answers
Turnkey Bookshop
13 (20.6%)
Hired Mourner
26 (41.3%)
Book Detective
20 (31.7%)
Spies in Paradise
36 (57.1%)
Art Detectives
22 (34.9%)
Which would you most like to read? (Choose up to 3.)
View Answers
Turnkey Bookshop
40 (54.1%)
Hired Mourner
44 (59.5%)
Book Detective
28 (37.8%)
Spies in Paradise
29 (39.2%)
Art Detectives
34 (45.9%)
Do any of these sound to you exactly like something else you've seen/read/heard of?
View Answers
Turnkey Bookshop
3 (18.8%)
Hired Mourner
0 (0.0%)
Book Detective
7 (43.8%)
Spies in Paradise
4 (25.0%)
Art Detectives
8 (50.0%)
Do you read cozy mystery at all?
View Answers
Yes or at least sometimes
43 (58.9%)
No
4 (5.5%)
Depends
22 (30.1%)
I don't know because I'm not sure what it is
4 (5.5%)
I realize there are no new things under the sun, etc, but that next-to-last question is in there mostly to make sure that I'm not ripping off every detail from something else I only vaguely half remember, so that I can change it up a bit.
Third Act Twist
Mar. 12th, 2022 12:10 pmWriting mystery/action on a pro level, after years of writing romance and training myself to think analytically about it, has been really interesting. Over the last 7(!!) years that I've been doing Zoe, I've read a lot about romance structure and feel like I have a pretty solid handle on how romance beats work, but I don't have nearly as much of a grounding in the theory, so to speak, of mystery, so it's been interesting coming up with a lot of it on my own and feeling out intuitively how it all works.
One of the things I've realized recently that I generally do when I'm plotting mystery or action/thriller - what makes it feel "complete" to me, in the way that romance needs certain beats to be complete - is something I've started calling the "third act twist" in my head, although actually, it doesn't necessarily happen in the third act; my books are not that tightly plotted. It can be anywhere from halfway to most of the way to the end.
What it is, though, is the point when the characters realize there's a second layer to the situation than what they knew about. The mystery isn't just "who did the crime"; in order for it to feel satisfying to me from a plotting perspective (though I don't always manage to do this; I don't think I did it in Dragon and Detective) there's a second level to it, where the characters find out that some aspect of what they thought was going on is just flat wrong, and this reorients their goals, points them at something new, and sets up the transition into a climax that is very different from what they thought the climax was going to be.
Critically, it's not just "you didn't know this" but also "your assumptions were wrong"; it's the rug-pull of thinking that they, and the reader, know approximately what's being set up, if not the exact details, and then finding out there's a second layer to it that's going to come into play in the climax and ends up setting up a different climax than the one the characters thought they were headed to. It's not revealing who the killer is, but rather, revealing that the victim isn't really dead, the entire crime is a cover for some other crime, the person they thought they were on the run from is actually an ally and there's a bigger bad out there, the person they've been trusting all along is about to betray them, etc.
I didn't do it in Dragon and Detective except perhaps in a very tangential way, and did it without realizing I was doing it in the subsequent Keeley books; then when I was plotting out another book this week, my plot was falling flat until I suddenly realized that I needed to add a second, hidden layer to the mystery, and then all of a sudden the whole thing clicked and came alive. It involves a certain level of reality-shifting - in order to get that satisfying "click" feeling, you need to find out that some early plot-driving assumption, on the part of both the reader and the characters, was wrong, and that sets the plot spinning off in a different direction than it looked like it was headed.
I don't think that you always need this to make the genre work, I'm sure there are plenty of perfectly excellent examples that don't have it, but by this point it's unconsciously become part of my Keeley plot formula.
Examples from my other Keeley books, with specific plot spoilers:
( Spoilers for the books published to date )
In general I think the main Third Act Twist variations I've been working with so far are: some aspect of the crime isn't what you thought it was, someone who was supposed to be a trustworthy ally isn't, or an antagonist who up to this point appeared to be the Big Bad switching sides and helping them against the real Big Bad.
For all I know there's an actual plotting-beat term for this, but Third Act Twist works fine for me; it describes what it does, and I know what I'm talking about.
Having figured this out is going to be immensely helpful for plotting this kind of book going forward, because I think when I get stuck on the big-picture plotting level, the solution is often just figuring out the second layer to the mystery and weaving it into the first.
It's also kind of interesting because this sort of sudden reversal of expectations/realization that Everything Was A Lie is exactly what you don't want in romance.
One of the things I've realized recently that I generally do when I'm plotting mystery or action/thriller - what makes it feel "complete" to me, in the way that romance needs certain beats to be complete - is something I've started calling the "third act twist" in my head, although actually, it doesn't necessarily happen in the third act; my books are not that tightly plotted. It can be anywhere from halfway to most of the way to the end.
What it is, though, is the point when the characters realize there's a second layer to the situation than what they knew about. The mystery isn't just "who did the crime"; in order for it to feel satisfying to me from a plotting perspective (though I don't always manage to do this; I don't think I did it in Dragon and Detective) there's a second level to it, where the characters find out that some aspect of what they thought was going on is just flat wrong, and this reorients their goals, points them at something new, and sets up the transition into a climax that is very different from what they thought the climax was going to be.
Critically, it's not just "you didn't know this" but also "your assumptions were wrong"; it's the rug-pull of thinking that they, and the reader, know approximately what's being set up, if not the exact details, and then finding out there's a second layer to it that's going to come into play in the climax and ends up setting up a different climax than the one the characters thought they were headed to. It's not revealing who the killer is, but rather, revealing that the victim isn't really dead, the entire crime is a cover for some other crime, the person they thought they were on the run from is actually an ally and there's a bigger bad out there, the person they've been trusting all along is about to betray them, etc.
I didn't do it in Dragon and Detective except perhaps in a very tangential way, and did it without realizing I was doing it in the subsequent Keeley books; then when I was plotting out another book this week, my plot was falling flat until I suddenly realized that I needed to add a second, hidden layer to the mystery, and then all of a sudden the whole thing clicked and came alive. It involves a certain level of reality-shifting - in order to get that satisfying "click" feeling, you need to find out that some early plot-driving assumption, on the part of both the reader and the characters, was wrong, and that sets the plot spinning off in a different direction than it looked like it was headed.
I don't think that you always need this to make the genre work, I'm sure there are plenty of perfectly excellent examples that don't have it, but by this point it's unconsciously become part of my Keeley plot formula.
Examples from my other Keeley books, with specific plot spoilers:
( Spoilers for the books published to date )
In general I think the main Third Act Twist variations I've been working with so far are: some aspect of the crime isn't what you thought it was, someone who was supposed to be a trustworthy ally isn't, or an antagonist who up to this point appeared to be the Big Bad switching sides and helping them against the real Big Bad.
For all I know there's an actual plotting-beat term for this, but Third Act Twist works fine for me; it describes what it does, and I know what I'm talking about.
Having figured this out is going to be immensely helpful for plotting this kind of book going forward, because I think when I get stuck on the big-picture plotting level, the solution is often just figuring out the second layer to the mystery and weaving it into the first.
It's also kind of interesting because this sort of sudden reversal of expectations/realization that Everything Was A Lie is exactly what you don't want in romance.
